2024: How did Betty Friedan and/or Marilyn Monroe reflect the changing role of women in US society?

Betty Friedan and Marilyn Monroe stand as two emblematic figures of mid-20th-century American womanhood, each representing contrasting dimensions of how gender roles were experienced, questioned, and transformed during a period of immense social change. Though they operated in different spheres—Friedan in political activism and Monroe in entertainment—their lives and legacies both reflect the evolving expectations placed on women and the tensions within those shifts. The 1950s and 1960s in the United States saw a fierce contest between the post-war ideal of the domestic woman and emerging challenges to that ideal. Friedan gave voice to growing feminist dissatisfaction, while Monroe embodied the paradox of sexual empowerment and objectification. Both women, in their own way, captured the public imagination and reflected the expanding debate about the role of women in American society.

Betty Friedan's contribution was intellectual and political. In 1963, she published The Feminine Mystique, a pivotal text that explored the widespread unhappiness of American housewives, who were, according to postwar ideals, supposed to be fulfilled by domestic life. Friedan had conducted interviews with suburban women, many of whom were educated but found themselves stifled by a life focused solely on homemaking. She coined the term “the problem that has no name” to describe this unspoken malaise. The book was a bestseller, and it played a crucial role in launching second-wave feminism. Friedan argued that women should be allowed and encouraged to pursue meaningful work outside the home, receive equal pay, and access higher education. Her ideas directly challenged the dominant postwar ideology that idealized women as passive supporters of their husbands and caretakers of their children.

Friedan’s activism extended beyond her writing. In 1966, she co-founded the National Organization for Women (NOW), which aimed to bring about legislative and social changes to improve women’s rights in employment, education, and reproductive health. She supported the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Title VII provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibited sex-based discrimination in the workplace. Her work inspired a generation of women to question traditional roles and demand greater autonomy over their lives. Friedan thus represents the intellectual and activist front of the feminist movement, reflecting a growing consciousness among American women that equality required not just legal reform, but also cultural change.

In contrast, Marilyn Monroe operated within the cultural and entertainment realm. She became one of the most iconic sex symbols of the 20th century, famous for her beauty, charm, and vulnerability. At first glance, Monroe seemed to reinforce traditional gender roles—her image was often that of the naive, hyper-feminized blonde who existed primarily to please men. Yet her life and career also reveal cracks in the very system that sought to exploit her image. Monroe was far from the simple, passive figure she was often portrayed to be. She was ambitious, intelligent, and deeply aware of the limits placed on her by Hollywood’s patriarchal structures. In 1955, Monroe took the bold step of founding her own production company, Marilyn Monroe Productions, in order to gain more control over her film roles. This was virtually unheard of at the time for a female star and demonstrated a desire for professional agency.

Monroe’s performances often played with the stereotypes assigned to her. In films like Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953) and Some Like It Hot (1959), she used the “dumb blonde” persona to her advantage, turning what could have been one-dimensional roles into layered performances that subtly critiqued the way society viewed women. Her persona was both a product of male fantasies and a clever manipulation of them. However, Monroe also suffered from the emotional and psychological toll of being typecast and objectified. Her tragic early death in 1962 at age 36 has often been interpreted as a symbol of the destructive pressures women faced under rigid expectations.

Both Friedan and Monroe were products of their time, yet each pushed against its limits in different ways. The 1950s idealized domesticity as the ultimate fulfillment for women. This was in part a reaction to World War II, when women had taken on jobs traditionally held by men. Once the war ended, there was a societal push to re-establish traditional gender roles. Magazines, advertisements, and television programs promoted the image of the happy housewife, and educational institutions often steered women away from academic or career ambitions. But beneath the surface, discontent brewed. Friedan’s work exposed this and gave it a name, while Monroe’s life showed how even the seemingly glamorous world of fame and beauty could be confining and dehumanizing.

In a deeper sense, Friedan and Monroe both reflected a transitional moment in American gender politics. Friedan sought structural change, advocating for legal rights and institutional reforms. Monroe, while not a political figure, became a cultural symbol around which debates about female sexuality, empowerment, and exploitation could be staged. Importantly, Monroe’s fame also demonstrated that women could wield mass appeal and commercial power, challenging the assumption that serious influence belonged only to men. While Monroe’s impact may not have been consciously feminist, her legacy continues to provoke discussions about representation, gender norms, and the cost of commodifying femininity.

Their lives intersected with larger historical trends. The postwar baby boom, suburbanization, the rise of consumer culture, and the early stages of the civil rights and feminist movements all formed the backdrop to their public and private struggles. In this context, Friedan and Monroe represent two sides of the same coin: the tension between what society told women to be and what women increasingly wanted for themselves. Where Friedan encouraged political and social rebellion against imposed domesticity, Monroe’s career illustrated the personal and psychological contradictions of being placed on a pedestal built by others.

In conclusion, Betty Friedan and Marilyn Monroe both reflected the changing role of women in U.S. society during a crucial period of transformation. Friedan gave voice to millions of women’s frustrations and helped catalyze a movement for equality and liberation. Monroe, though often misunderstood, embodied the complexities of female identity in a culture that both idolized and constrained women. Together, they represent different but equally powerful critiques of mid-century gender roles, making visible the shifting landscape of American womanhood. Their contributions—one through activism, the other through cultural symbolism—continue to shape our understanding of gender, power, and societal change.